I would
like to begin with music this time, perhaps you would you care to check this youtube clip for
example: Friday was Finland’s 96th Day of Independence and today, on
the 8th of December, we are celebrating the birthday of Jean
Sibelius. I was busy working on my Final
Project on Independence Day which made me feel kind of solemn and full of
self-criticismJ
It was good
to learn about the learning styles this week, in a way a good mixture of theory
and praxis. To begin with, I did the test http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/mi/w1_interactive1.html,
to see what my key approach to learning would be (of Howard Gardner’s multiple
intelligences). Well, to no surprise at all, I found that I was best at interpersonal
skills and should be working as a teacher, human resource manager,
cousellor:D:D I did the test twice, same
result of course. I sent the quiz to my boy, 19, too. He might find something
there as regards music or maybe the spatial dimension. Anyway, fun as it was
taking that little test, as I read further along our suggested list for this
week, my suspicions were growing. Is this all about learning styles and
personality types bringing us too close to stuff like – horoscopes? But in the readings there was a little bit of scientific
evidence also to motivate us to learning of these things – and I think the bottom
line would be: you have to know your students and you have to give space to
their personality as an entity plus the special talents and traits there are in
each and everyone of us. Another key issue is of course that we have to know
about and work on ourselves as learners and processors of information, in order
to improve as teachers or “preachers” (which I sometimes think I am being a
state official and with a job where informing of policies and best practices is
what I do a lot!).
Some issues
in our readings reminded me of the current topics in the educational discussion
in my country too. To mention just two of different sort; first a detail from
the multiple intelligences –
a new type discovered by Prof Gardner are the naturalists, the ones who relate
their learning best to the environments (learning environments). Here we found
eg the tip about using geocaching to
learn; quite popular already in Finland outside school and amongst geography teachers but I wonder whether it is so amongst
the teachers of languages though. The whole thing is also symptomatic of our times
as we should realise that the focus in learning and teaching cannot be confined within the four walls
of a classroom any longer but we should encourage and recognise learning in a variety of settings, and everywhere – in our
ubiquitous existence of the 21st century.
Another
issue that came to my mind repeatedly while reading about learning styles: It
is all about motivation (cf. the
Montgomery and Groat article)! For Finnish basic education this is presently
a major challenge, also reflected in our PISA 2012 decline: how do we motivate
kids to study and work hard or at least in a goal-oriented way in the first
place, and then how do we motivate them
to study math or Swedish which a famously problematic as subjects that cannot
be learnt without some effort and which have – undeservedly – a reputation
as dull subjects. Well, tomorrow back to work which delightfully will take me
again to our agency’s languages team and our work with the languages
curriculum.
And alas - tomorrow will be the beginning of our last week at Webskills.
HI Paula!
ReplyDeleteYes you are right we have to know our students to help them get the best out of them, There was the possibility to install a thermoelectric plant ten klmts from my comunity and I saw some of my high school students and parents with banners against that plant, then I thought they are really engaged doing something against pullution, How engaged are we about their learning? do we give them the opportunities to develop their skills? are we promoting critical thinking and autonomy learning?